This study is currently not recruiting participants.

An Experimental Investigation of the Contexts and Mechanisms Shaping the Procedural Preferences of Judges When Triaging Family Law Disputes

Research on Judicial Preferences in Family Law Disputes

Not Recruiting
100 years or below
All
Phase N/A
1 Location

Brief description of study.

The purpose of this study is to address the existing gap in knowledge about how particular contexts and causal mechanisms shape judicial preferences for formal legal versus ADR procedures in family law disputes.

Detailed description of study

The purpose of this study is to address the existing gap in knowledge about how particular contexts and causal mechanisms shape judicial preferences for formal legal versus ADR procedures in family law disputes.

Eligibility of study

You may be eligible for this study if you meet the following criteria:

  • Conditions: Healthy
  • Age: 100 years or below
  • Gender: All

This study investigates how different situations and reasons influence judicial choices between formal legal processes and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in family law cases. Family law disputes can involve issues like divorce, child custody, and property division, where decisions can be made through formal legal channels or ADR, which is a way to resolve disputes outside of court.

Participants will be involved in procedures that help understand the factors affecting judicial preferences. These procedures will collect information on how judges make decisions in various family law scenarios.

  • Who can participate: Participants must be involved in family law cases.
  • Study details: Participants will engage in interviews or surveys to provide insights into decision-making processes in family law. The study will not include any treatment or medication.
Updated on 19 Feb 2024. Study ID: 1410500170

Interested in the study?

Select a study center that’s convenient for you, and get in touch with the study team.

Connect with the study team